# Feature or enhancement ### Proposal: Seems like when adding `warnings.deprecated` in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/104004, it was forgotten to add one of the two stack skipping arguments. It needs it for the same reasons why it already got `stacklevel`, e.g. because adding decorators adds stack levels in a hard to predict way (e.g. a 3rd party decorator might start calling the wrapped function one level deeper, suddenly changing where the warning points) ### Has this already been discussed elsewhere? Yes, and it was accepted, but then apparently fogotten, see link below cc @brettcannon @JelleZijlstra ### Links to previous discussion of this feature: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036/11 <!-- gh-linked-prs --> ### Linked PRs * gh-156937 <!-- /gh-linked-prs -->