Hi Anthropic team, I’m working on ForgeCat, a tool for making agent profiles such as skills, agents, rules, commands, hooks, and MCP configs easier to install across different agent tools. We found the knowledge-work plugin collection useful for reusable domain workflows, so we created initial ForgeCat profiles for it here: Profile repo: https://github.com/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/tree/main/profiles/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins Install example: `forgecat install @forgecat/anthropics_knowledge-work-plugins_bio-research` ForgeCat currently supports Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex, and we’re also planning support for OpenClaw, Hermes, and other agent runtimes. The goal is to help people reuse useful agent workflows across tools while keeping attribution and links back to the original repository. I wanted to check with you before we continue maintaining this profile. Which option best matches your preference? 1. The current ForgeCat profile is okay as-is. 2. Keeping the profile is okay, but some description, attribution, license, or supported platform notes should be corrected. 3. You’d prefer to publish or maintain the ForgeCat profile directly. 4. You’d prefer that we remove this ForgeCat profile. If you prefer removal, we can take it down. Getting Started: ```bash npm install -g forgecat forgecat search <keyword> forgecat install @forgecat/anthropics_knowledge-work-plugins_bio-research ``` Docs: https://forgecat.ai/docs Thanks, and happy to adjust anything that doesn’t represent the original project accurately.